Changes

102 bytes removed ,  12 years ago
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
[[Image:UnderConstruction.png]]
  −
   
'''JIG''' stands for '''Joint ccNSO-GNSO Internationalized Domain Names Working Group'''. The main purpose of the JIG is to deal with various issues related to the introduction of Internationalized Domain Names ([[IDN]]) [[ccTLD]]s under the IDN ccTLD Fast Track Implementation Process. It also deals with issues related to the introduction of IDN [[gTLD]]s under the new gTLD implementation process. <ref>[http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/jiwg.htm ccnso.icann.org]</ref>
 
'''JIG''' stands for '''Joint ccNSO-GNSO Internationalized Domain Names Working Group'''. The main purpose of the JIG is to deal with various issues related to the introduction of Internationalized Domain Names ([[IDN]]) [[ccTLD]]s under the IDN ccTLD Fast Track Implementation Process. It also deals with issues related to the introduction of IDN [[gTLD]]s under the new gTLD implementation process. <ref>[http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/jiwg.htm ccnso.icann.org]</ref>
    
== Background ==
 
== Background ==
During the [[ICANN]] meeting in Sydney ([[ICANN 35]]), the [[GNSO]] and [[ccNSO]] council came to the conclusion that there are certain issues or topics related to the introduction of IDN ccTLDs under the IDN ccTLDs Fast Track Implementation process and introduction of IDN gTLDs under the new gTLD Implementation Process of common interests of both GNSO and ccNSO. These issues were common to both the councils, so it was preferred that a collaborative working group was drafted which will address these topics or issues. On the basis of this a Joint Working Group (JIG) was tasked to identify, explore and research on the topics and issues which were common to both GNSO and ccNSO councils. Once the JIG identifies and explores such issue or topic, it will recommend the appropriate methodology to address these issues. However, it was commonly decided by both the councils that the ongoing implementation work of new gTLDs and IDN ccTLDs should not be delayed waiting for the reports from JIG. <ref>[https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/13009033/jiwg-charter.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1302029852000 community.icann.org]</ref>
+
During the [[ICANN]] meeting in Sydney ([[ICANN 35]]), the [[GNSO]] and [[ccNSO]] council came to the conclusion that there are certain issues or topics of common interest between the two organizations related to the introduction of IDN ccTLDs under the IDN ccTLDs Fast Track Implementation process and introduction of IDN gTLDs under the new gTLD Implementation Process. It was suggested that a collaborative working group should drafted to address these common topics or issues; as such, a Joint Working Group (JIG) was tasked to identify, explore and research on the topics and issues which were common to both GNSO and ccNSO councils. Once the JIG identified and explored the issues, it was to recommend the appropriate methodology to address the issues. However, it was commonly decided by both the councils that the ongoing implementation of new gTLDs and IDN ccTLDs should not be delayed waiting for the reports from JIG.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/13009033/jiwg-charter.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1302029852000 community.icann.org]</ref>
    
== Scope ==
 
== Scope ==
14,326

edits